Greenland vs San Marino: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Greenland
- San Marino
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 51,324 constant 2015 US$ against 49,930 constant 2015 US$ in Greenland, a difference of 1,394 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was San Marino ahead.
Greenland ranks 21st and San Marino ranks 20th of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and San Marino in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,619 constant 2015 US$ | 51,701 constant 2015 US$ | 23,082 constant 2015 US$ | San Marino |
| 2000s | 36,361 constant 2015 US$ | 58,596 constant 2015 US$ | 22,235 constant 2015 US$ | San Marino |
| 2010s | 45,190 constant 2015 US$ | 43,943 constant 2015 US$ | 1,247 constant 2015 US$ | Greenland |
| 2020s | 49,122 constant 2015 US$ | 47,486 constant 2015 US$ | 1,637 constant 2015 US$ | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Greenland or San Marino?
- San Marino, at 51,324 constant 2015 US$ against 49,930 constant 2015 US$ in Greenland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Greenland and San Marino?
- 1,394 constant 2015 US$, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and San Marino?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
- How do Greenland and San Marino rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Greenland ranks 21st and San Marino ranks 20th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.