Curaçao vs Oman: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Curaçao
- Oman
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 18,045 constant 2015 US$ against 17,074 constant 2015 US$ in Oman, a difference of 971 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Curaçao's figure about 1.1 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Curaçao ahead.
Curaçao ranks 66th and Oman ranks 69th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Curaçao averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21,447 constant 2015 US$ | 20,479 constant 2015 US$ | 967.87 constant 2015 US$ | Curaçao |
| 2010s | 19,426 constant 2015 US$ | 19,389 constant 2015 US$ | 36.88 constant 2015 US$ | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 16,524 constant 2015 US$ | 18,006 constant 2015 US$ | 1,482 constant 2015 US$ | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Curaçao or Oman?
- Curaçao, at 18,045 constant 2015 US$ against 17,074 constant 2015 US$ in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Curaçao and Oman?
- 971 constant 2015 US$, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Oman?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Curaçao and Oman rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Curaçao ranks 66th and Oman ranks 69th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.