Croatia vs Uruguay: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Croatia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 19,374 constant 2015 US$ against 18,414 constant 2015 US$ in Croatia, a difference of 960 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 210 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,864 constant 2015 US$ | 9,971 constant 2015 US$ | 2,106 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 11,155 constant 2015 US$ | 11,367 constant 2015 US$ | 211.37 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 12,676 constant 2015 US$ | 16,734 constant 2015 US$ | 4,058 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 16,509 constant 2015 US$ | 18,152 constant 2015 US$ | 1,643 constant 2015 US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Croatia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 19,374 constant 2015 US$ against 18,414 constant 2015 US$ in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Croatia and Uruguay?
- 960 constant 2015 US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Uruguay?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Uruguay rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Croatia ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 62nd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.