Chagai vs Monaco: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Chagai
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 247,170 constant 2015 US$ against 69,818 constant 2015 US$ in Chagai, a difference of 177,352 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Monaco's figure about 3.5 times Chagai's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Chagai ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 3 regions.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chagai | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67,618 constant 2015 US$ | 142,375 constant 2015 US$ | 74,757 constant 2015 US$ | Monaco |
| 2010s | 62,939 constant 2015 US$ | 162,698 constant 2015 US$ | 99,759 constant 2015 US$ | Monaco |
| 2020s | 65,058 constant 2015 US$ | 199,046 constant 2015 US$ | 133,988 constant 2015 US$ | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Chagai or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 247,170 constant 2015 US$ against 69,818 constant 2015 US$ in Chagai as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Chagai and Monaco?
- 177,352 constant 2015 US$, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Monaco?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Chagai and Monaco rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Chagai ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 3 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.