Chagai vs Luxembourg: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Chagai
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 103,292 constant 2015 US$ against 69,818 constant 2015 US$ in Chagai, a difference of 33,474 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Chagai's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Chagai ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 4th of 3 regions.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chagai | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67,618 constant 2015 US$ | 104,576 constant 2015 US$ | 36,958 constant 2015 US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 62,939 constant 2015 US$ | 106,259 constant 2015 US$ | 43,319 constant 2015 US$ | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 65,058 constant 2015 US$ | 107,259 constant 2015 US$ | 42,201 constant 2015 US$ | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Chagai or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 103,292 constant 2015 US$ against 69,818 constant 2015 US$ in Chagai as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Chagai and Luxembourg?
- 33,474 constant 2015 US$, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chagai and Luxembourg?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Chagai and Luxembourg rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Chagai ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 4th of 3 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.