Cayman Islands vs Norway: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Cayman Islands
- Norway
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 84,382 constant 2015 US$ against 83,813 constant 2015 US$ in Norway, a difference of 569 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 6th and Norway ranks 8th of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cayman Islands averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92,346 constant 2015 US$ | 76,050 constant 2015 US$ | 16,296 constant 2015 US$ | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 77,808 constant 2015 US$ | 76,985 constant 2015 US$ | 823.66 constant 2015 US$ | Cayman Islands |
| 2020s | 79,938 constant 2015 US$ | 81,986 constant 2015 US$ | 2,048 constant 2015 US$ | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Cayman Islands or Norway?
- Cayman Islands, at 84,382 constant 2015 US$ against 83,813 constant 2015 US$ in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Cayman Islands and Norway?
- 569 constant 2015 US$, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Norway?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Cayman Islands and Norway rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Cayman Islands ranks 6th and Norway ranks 8th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.