Bulgaria vs Grenada: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Bulgaria
- Grenada
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 10,477 constant 2015 US$ against 10,454 constant 2015 US$ in Bulgaria, a difference of 23 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Grenada ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 88th and Grenada ranks 87th of 210 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Grenada in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4,057 constant 2015 US$ | 4,116 constant 2015 US$ | 59.33 constant 2015 US$ | Grenada |
| 1990s | 3,938 constant 2015 US$ | 5,327 constant 2015 US$ | 1,389 constant 2015 US$ | Grenada |
| 2000s | 5,095 constant 2015 US$ | 7,471 constant 2015 US$ | 2,376 constant 2015 US$ | Grenada |
| 2010s | 7,304 constant 2015 US$ | 8,539 constant 2015 US$ | 1,235 constant 2015 US$ | Grenada |
| 2020s | 9,595 constant 2015 US$ | 9,490 constant 2015 US$ | 105.1 constant 2015 US$ | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Bulgaria or Grenada?
- Grenada, at 10,477 constant 2015 US$ against 10,454 constant 2015 US$ in Bulgaria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Bulgaria and Grenada?
- 23 constant 2015 US$, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Grenada?
- 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and Grenada rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Bulgaria ranks 88th and Grenada ranks 87th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.