Botswana vs North Macedonia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Botswana
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 6,873 constant 2015 US$ against 6,791 constant 2015 US$ in Botswana, a difference of 82 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 109th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,444 constant 2015 US$ | 3,079 constant 2015 US$ | 1,366 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
| 2000s | 5,470 constant 2015 US$ | 3,694 constant 2015 US$ | 1,777 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
| 2010s | 6,310 constant 2015 US$ | 5,178 constant 2015 US$ | 1,132 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
| 2020s | 6,887 constant 2015 US$ | 6,331 constant 2015 US$ | 556.16 constant 2015 US$ | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Botswana or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 6,873 constant 2015 US$ against 6,791 constant 2015 US$ in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 82 constant 2015 US$, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Botswana ranks 109th and North Macedonia ranks 108th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.