Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 6,944 constant 2015 US$ against 6,891 constant 2015 US$ in Peru, a difference of 53 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Peru ranks 106th of 212 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,303 constant 2015 US$ | 2,996 constant 2015 US$ | 1,693 constant 2015 US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 3,196 constant 2015 US$ | 3,900 constant 2015 US$ | 704.76 constant 2015 US$ | Peru |
| 2010s | 4,652 constant 2015 US$ | 6,079 constant 2015 US$ | 1,427 constant 2015 US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 6,333 constant 2015 US$ | 6,542 constant 2015 US$ | 209.2 constant 2015 US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 6,944 constant 2015 US$ against 6,891 constant 2015 US$ in Peru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 53 constant 2015 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 104th and Peru ranks 106th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.