Belarus vs Georgia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Georgia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 6,938 constant 2015 US$ against 6,877 constant 2015 US$ in Georgia, a difference of 61 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Georgia ahead.
Belarus ranks 104th and Georgia ranks 107th of 210 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,362 constant 2015 US$ | 1,635 constant 2015 US$ | 726.76 constant 2015 US$ | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3,817 constant 2015 US$ | 2,270 constant 2015 US$ | 1,547 constant 2015 US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 6,012 constant 2015 US$ | 4,027 constant 2015 US$ | 1,984 constant 2015 US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 6,528 constant 2015 US$ | 5,873 constant 2015 US$ | 655.29 constant 2015 US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or Georgia?
- Belarus, at 6,938 constant 2015 US$ against 6,877 constant 2015 US$ in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and Georgia?
- 61 constant 2015 US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Georgia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Georgia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 104th and Georgia ranks 107th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.