Belarus vs Colombia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 6,976 constant 2015 US$ against 6,938 constant 2015 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 38 constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Colombia ahead.
Belarus ranks 104th and Colombia ranks 102nd of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Colombia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,362 constant 2015 US$ | 4,002 constant 2015 US$ | 1,640 constant 2015 US$ | Colombia |
| 2000s | 3,817 constant 2015 US$ | 4,476 constant 2015 US$ | 658.93 constant 2015 US$ | Colombia |
| 2010s | 6,012 constant 2015 US$ | 6,011 constant 2015 US$ | 0.803 constant 2015 US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 6,528 constant 2015 US$ | 6,647 constant 2015 US$ | 119.55 constant 2015 US$ | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Belarus or Colombia?
- Colombia, at 6,976 constant 2015 US$ against 6,938 constant 2015 US$ in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Belarus and Colombia?
- 38 constant 2015 US$, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Belarus ranks 104th and Colombia ranks 102nd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.