Barbados vs Slovenia: GDP per capita
GDP per capita over time
- Barbados
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 26,367 constant 2015 US$ against 23,014 constant 2015 US$ in Barbados, a difference of 3,353 constant 2015 US$.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 49th of 210 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,439 constant 2015 US$ | 13,448 constant 2015 US$ | 5,992 constant 2015 US$ | Barbados |
| 2000s | 22,912 constant 2015 US$ | 18,912 constant 2015 US$ | 4,000 constant 2015 US$ | Barbados |
| 2010s | 20,741 constant 2015 US$ | 21,245 constant 2015 US$ | 504.02 constant 2015 US$ | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 20,651 constant 2015 US$ | 25,171 constant 2015 US$ | 4,521 constant 2015 US$ | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp per capita, Barbados or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 26,367 constant 2015 US$ against 23,014 constant 2015 US$ in Barbados as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp per capita between Barbados and Slovenia?
- 3,353 constant 2015 US$, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Slovenia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Slovenia rank globally for gdp per capita?
- Barbados ranks 52nd and Slovenia ranks 49th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP per capita (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. The core indicator has been divided by the general population to achieve a per capita estimate.This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.