Russia vs Tanzania: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Russia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 229.06 trillion current LCU against 214.26 trillion current LCU in Russia, a difference of 14.79 trillion current LCU.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Russia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania ahead.
Russia ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 19th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Russia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.40 trillion current LCU | 4.49 trillion current LCU | 3.08 trillion current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 21.92 trillion current LCU | 21.34 trillion current LCU | 578.18 billion current LCU | Russia |
| 2010s | 80.06 trillion current LCU | 90.67 trillion current LCU | 10.61 trillion current LCU | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 165.04 trillion current LCU | 185.27 trillion current LCU | 20.23 trillion current LCU | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Russia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 229.06 trillion current LCU against 214.26 trillion current LCU in Russia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Russia and Tanzania?
- 14.79 trillion current LCU, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russia and Tanzania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Russia and Tanzania rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Russia ranks 21st and Tanzania ranks 19th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.