Mongolia vs Pakistan: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Mongolia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 113.81 trillion current LCU against 89.94 trillion current LCU in Mongolia, a difference of 23.87 trillion current LCU.
That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 213 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 504.97 billion current LCU | 2.92 trillion current LCU | 2.42 trillion current LCU | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 3.35 trillion current LCU | 8.79 trillion current LCU | 5.43 trillion current LCU | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 22.63 trillion current LCU | 29.33 trillion current LCU | 6.70 trillion current LCU | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 62.65 trillion current LCU | 78.79 trillion current LCU | 16.14 trillion current LCU | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Mongolia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 113.81 trillion current LCU against 89.94 trillion current LCU in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Mongolia and Pakistan?
- 23.87 trillion current LCU, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Pakistan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Pakistan rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Mongolia ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 28th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.