Mauritius vs Zambia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 743.21 billion current LCU against 725.64 billion current LCU in Zambia, a difference of 17.57 billion current LCU.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 115th of 213 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.25 billion current LCU | 3.28 billion current LCU | 67.97 billion current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 201.88 billion current LCU | 38.12 billion current LCU | 163.76 billion current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 417.61 billion current LCU | 188.23 billion current LCU | 229.38 billion current LCU | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 597.46 billion current LCU | 535.69 billion current LCU | 61.77 billion current LCU | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 743.21 billion current LCU against 725.64 billion current LCU in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 17.57 billion current LCU, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Mauritius ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 115th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.