Kyrgyzstan vs Romania: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Romania
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 1.98 trillion current LCU against 1.92 trillion current LCU in Romania, a difference of 59.99 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Romania ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 91st and Romania ranks 92nd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.14 billion current LCU | 14.45 billion current LCU | 2.69 billion current LCU | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 113.86 billion current LCU | 291.32 billion current LCU | 177.46 billion current LCU | Romania |
| 2010s | 423.35 billion current LCU | 737.86 billion current LCU | 314.51 billion current LCU | Romania |
| 2020s | 1.22 trillion current LCU | 1.48 trillion current LCU | 260.73 billion current LCU | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Kyrgyzstan or Romania?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 1.98 trillion current LCU against 1.92 trillion current LCU in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 59.99 billion current LCU, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Romania?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Romania rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 91st and Romania ranks 92nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.