Israel vs Malaysia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Israel
- Malaysia
How they compare
Israel currently reports 2.11 trillion current LCU against 2.02 trillion current LCU in Malaysia, a difference of 85.26 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Israel ahead.
Israel ranks 88th and Malaysia ranks 90th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 303.74 billion current LCU | 211.45 billion current LCU | 92.29 billion current LCU | Israel |
| 2000s | 669.87 billion current LCU | 527.35 billion current LCU | 142.52 billion current LCU | Israel |
| 2010s | 1.15 trillion current LCU | 1.16 trillion current LCU | 5.24 billion current LCU | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 1.79 trillion current LCU | 1.76 trillion current LCU | 36.13 billion current LCU | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Israel or Malaysia?
- Israel, at 2.11 trillion current LCU against 2.02 trillion current LCU in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Israel and Malaysia?
- 85.26 billion current LCU, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Malaysia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Malaysia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Israel ranks 88th and Malaysia ranks 90th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.