El Salvador vs Eritrea: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- El Salvador
- Eritrea
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 36.71 billion current LCU against 31.75 billion current LCU in Eritrea, a difference of 4.96 billion current LCU.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.2 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 164th and Eritrea ranks 167th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.89 billion current LCU | 3.94 billion current LCU | 4.95 billion current LCU | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 14.70 billion current LCU | 15.84 billion current LCU | 1.14 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 19.37 billion current LCU | 28.09 billion current LCU | 8.73 billion current LCU | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, El Salvador or Eritrea?
- El Salvador, at 36.71 billion current LCU against 31.75 billion current LCU in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between El Salvador and Eritrea?
- 4.96 billion current LCU, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Eritrea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do El Salvador and Eritrea rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- El Salvador ranks 164th and Eritrea ranks 167th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.