Ecuador vs Slovakia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Ecuador
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 136.75 billion current LCU against 130.32 billion current LCU in Ecuador, a difference of 6.43 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 144th and Slovakia ranks 142nd of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Slovakia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.80 billion current LCU | 18.78 billion current LCU | 2.02 billion current LCU | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 39.09 billion current LCU | 49.28 billion current LCU | 10.19 billion current LCU | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 94.86 billion current LCU | 79.71 billion current LCU | 15.15 billion current LCU | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 115.68 billion current LCU | 116.11 billion current LCU | 430.02 million current LCU | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Ecuador or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 136.75 billion current LCU against 130.32 billion current LCU in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 6.43 billion current LCU, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovakia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Slovakia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Ecuador ranks 144th and Slovakia ranks 142nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.