Cuba vs North Macedonia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Cuba
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1.08 trillion current LCU against 1.04 trillion current LCU in North Macedonia, a difference of 40.86 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 103rd and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.16 billion current LCU | 121.46 billion current LCU | 99.30 billion current LCU | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 44.68 billion current LCU | 315.48 billion current LCU | 270.80 billion current LCU | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 84.31 billion current LCU | 552.31 billion current LCU | 468.00 billion current LCU | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 639.92 billion current LCU | 816.36 billion current LCU | 176.44 billion current LCU | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Cuba or North Macedonia?
- Cuba, at 1.08 trillion current LCU against 1.04 trillion current LCU in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 40.86 billion current LCU, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and North Macedonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and North Macedonia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Cuba ranks 103rd and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.