Congo vs Serbia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 10.39 trillion current LCU against 9.49 trillion current LCU in Congo, a difference of 903.40 billion current LCU.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 61st of 213 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.38 trillion current LCU | 160.63 billion current LCU | 1.22 trillion current LCU | Congo |
| 2000s | 3.36 trillion current LCU | 1.84 trillion current LCU | 1.52 trillion current LCU | Congo |
| 2010s | 7.77 trillion current LCU | 4.49 trillion current LCU | 3.29 trillion current LCU | Congo |
| 2020s | 8.83 trillion current LCU | 8.13 trillion current LCU | 707.28 billion current LCU | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Congo or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 10.39 trillion current LCU against 9.49 trillion current LCU in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Congo and Serbia?
- 903.40 billion current LCU, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Congo ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 61st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.