Congo vs Czechia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Congo
- Czechia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 9.49 trillion current LCU against 8.56 trillion current LCU in Czechia, a difference of 932.85 billion current LCU.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 62nd and Czechia ranks 64th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.13 trillion current LCU | 1.51 trillion current LCU | 375.30 billion current LCU | Czechia |
| 2000s | 3.36 trillion current LCU | 3.23 trillion current LCU | 136.04 billion current LCU | Congo |
| 2010s | 7.77 trillion current LCU | 4.68 trillion current LCU | 3.09 trillion current LCU | Congo |
| 2020s | 8.83 trillion current LCU | 7.24 trillion current LCU | 1.59 trillion current LCU | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Congo or Czechia?
- Congo, at 9.49 trillion current LCU against 8.56 trillion current LCU in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Congo and Czechia?
- 932.85 billion current LCU, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Czechia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Czechia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Congo ranks 62nd and Czechia ranks 64th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.