Colombia vs Japan: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Colombia
- Japan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1,853.95 trillion current LCU against 663.76 trillion current LCU in Japan, a difference of 1,190.19 trillion current LCU.
That makes Colombia's figure about 2.8 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Colombia ranks 6th and Japan ranks 9th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.85 trillion current LCU | 523.26 trillion current LCU | 425.41 trillion current LCU | Japan |
| 2000s | 338.60 trillion current LCU | 533.53 trillion current LCU | 194.93 trillion current LCU | Japan |
| 2010s | 794.34 trillion current LCU | 537.04 trillion current LCU | 257.30 trillion current LCU | Colombia |
| 2020s | 1,469.44 trillion current LCU | 604.43 trillion current LCU | 865.02 trillion current LCU | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Colombia or Japan?
- Colombia, at 1,853.95 trillion current LCU against 663.76 trillion current LCU in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Colombia and Japan?
- 1,190.19 trillion current LCU, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Japan?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and Japan rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Colombia ranks 6th and Japan ranks 9th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.