Brazil vs Ethiopia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Brazil
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 15.09 trillion current LCU against 12.74 trillion current LCU in Brazil, a difference of 2.36 trillion current LCU.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Brazil ranks 55th and Ethiopia ranks 53rd of 214 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 496.69 billion current LCU | 44.04 billion current LCU | 452.65 billion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2000s | 2.14 trillion current LCU | 136.55 billion current LCU | 2.01 trillion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2010s | 5.74 trillion current LCU | 1.32 trillion current LCU | 4.43 trillion current LCU | Brazil |
| 2020s | 10.36 trillion current LCU | 8.25 trillion current LCU | 2.11 trillion current LCU | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Brazil or Ethiopia?
- Ethiopia, at 15.09 trillion current LCU against 12.74 trillion current LCU in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 2.36 trillion current LCU, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Ethiopia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Brazil ranks 55th and Ethiopia ranks 53rd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.