Botswana vs Libya: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Botswana
- Libya
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 269.08 billion current LCU against 255.17 billion current LCU in Libya, a difference of 13.91 billion current LCU.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.
Botswana ranks 132nd and Libya ranks 133rd of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.55 billion current LCU | 11.24 billion current LCU | 2.30 billion current LCU | Botswana |
| 2000s | 48.95 billion current LCU | 55.20 billion current LCU | 6.26 billion current LCU | Libya |
| 2010s | 137.59 billion current LCU | 87.18 billion current LCU | 50.41 billion current LCU | Botswana |
| 2020s | 237.54 billion current LCU | 188.93 billion current LCU | 48.61 billion current LCU | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Botswana or Libya?
- Botswana, at 269.08 billion current LCU against 255.17 billion current LCU in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Botswana and Libya?
- 13.91 billion current LCU, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Libya?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Libya rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Botswana ranks 132nd and Libya ranks 133rd of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.