Bhutan vs Cape Verde: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Bhutan
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 311.97 billion current LCU against 299.13 billion current LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 12.84 billion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Bhutan ranks 125th and Cape Verde ranks 127th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Cape Verde in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.52 billion current LCU | 40.11 billion current LCU | 29.59 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 38.93 billion current LCU | 107.44 billion current LCU | 68.50 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 135.41 billion current LCU | 179.89 billion current LCU | 44.48 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 242.57 billion current LCU | 238.99 billion current LCU | 3.59 billion current LCU | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Bhutan or Cape Verde?
- Bhutan, at 311.97 billion current LCU against 299.13 billion current LCU in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Bhutan and Cape Verde?
- 12.84 billion current LCU, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Cape Verde?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Cape Verde rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Bhutan ranks 125th and Cape Verde ranks 127th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.