Belarus vs Namibia: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Belarus
- Namibia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 286.65 billion current LCU against 269.77 billion current LCU in Namibia, a difference of 16.88 billion current LCU.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Belarus ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 131st of 214 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.27 million current LCU | 14.63 billion current LCU | 14.58 billion current LCU | Namibia |
| 2000s | 6.52 billion current LCU | 48.30 billion current LCU | 41.78 billion current LCU | Namibia |
| 2010s | 79.78 billion current LCU | 137.19 billion current LCU | 57.41 billion current LCU | Namibia |
| 2020s | 213.35 billion current LCU | 218.98 billion current LCU | 5.64 billion current LCU | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Belarus or Namibia?
- Belarus, at 286.65 billion current LCU against 269.77 billion current LCU in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Belarus and Namibia?
- 16.88 billion current LCU, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 131st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.