Belarus vs Cape Verde: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Belarus
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 299.13 billion current LCU against 286.65 billion current LCU in Belarus, a difference of 12.48 billion current LCU.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 128th and Cape Verde ranks 127th of 213 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44.27 million current LCU | 40.11 billion current LCU | 40.06 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 6.52 billion current LCU | 107.44 billion current LCU | 100.91 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 79.78 billion current LCU | 179.89 billion current LCU | 100.10 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 213.35 billion current LCU | 238.99 billion current LCU | 25.64 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Belarus or Cape Verde?
- Cape Verde, at 299.13 billion current LCU against 286.65 billion current LCU in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Belarus and Cape Verde?
- 12.48 billion current LCU, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cape Verde?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Cape Verde rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Belarus ranks 128th and Cape Verde ranks 127th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.