Australia vs Israel: GDP: linked series
GDP: linked series over time
- Australia
- Israel
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2.78 trillion current LCU against 2.11 trillion current LCU in Israel, a difference of 670.56 billion current LCU.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Israel's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 85th and Israel ranks 88th of 212 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 495.42 billion current LCU | 303.74 billion current LCU | 191.68 billion current LCU | Australia |
| 2000s | 926.73 billion current LCU | 669.87 billion current LCU | 256.86 billion current LCU | Australia |
| 2010s | 1.63 trillion current LCU | 1.15 trillion current LCU | 471.49 billion current LCU | Australia |
| 2020s | 2.41 trillion current LCU | 1.79 trillion current LCU | 615.77 billion current LCU | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp: linked series, Australia or Israel?
- Australia, at 2.78 trillion current LCU against 2.11 trillion current LCU in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp: linked series between Australia and Israel?
- 670.56 billion current LCU, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Israel?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Israel rank globally for gdp: linked series?
- Australia ranks 85th and Israel ranks 88th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as GDP: linked series (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This series has been linked to produce a consistent time series to counteract breaks in series over time due to changes in base years, source data and methodologies. Thus, it may not be comparable with other national accounts series in the database for historical years. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.