Pre-demographic dividend vs Turkmenistan: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Pre-demographic dividend
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 6.3% against 3.6% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.8 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Pre-demographic dividend ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
Across the 5 decades both report, Pre-demographic dividend averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pre-demographic dividend | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2.6% | 3.4% | 0.8% | Turkmenistan |
| 1990s | 2.8% | 1.2% | 1.6% | Pre-demographic dividend |
| 2000s | 5.7% | 7.4% | 1.7% | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 3.9% | 8.7% | 4.8% | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 6.2% | 4.2% | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Pre-demographic dividend or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 6.3% against 3.6% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Pre-demographic dividend and Turkmenistan?
- 2.7%, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pre-demographic dividend and Turkmenistan?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Pre-demographic dividend and Turkmenistan rank globally for gdp growth?
- Pre-demographic dividend ranks 29th and Turkmenistan ranks 32nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.