Least developed countries vs Timor-Leste: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Least developed countries
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 7.0% against 4.3% in Least developed countries, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.6 times Least developed countries's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Least developed countries ranks 20th and Timor-Leste ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Least developed countries | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.0% | 2.2% | 0.8% | Least developed countries |
| 2000s | 5.8% | 9.7% | 3.8% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 4.5% | 5.4% | 0.9% | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 3.1% | -0.6% | 3.7% | Least developed countries |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Least developed countries or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 7.0% against 4.3% in Least developed countries as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Least developed countries and Timor-Leste?
- 2.7%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Timor-Leste?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Least developed countries and Timor-Leste rank globally for gdp growth?
- Least developed countries ranks 20th and Timor-Leste ranks 21st of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.