Eritrea vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Eritrea
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 8.7% against 5.8% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 2.9%.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 8th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th of 215 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.1% | 3.5% | 4.5% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.5% | 4.6% | 4.2% | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2010s | 5.4% | 5.2% | 0.3% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Eritrea or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Eritrea, at 8.7% against 5.8% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Eritrea and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- 2.9%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for gdp growth?
- Eritrea ranks 8th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 5th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.