Early-demographic dividend vs Guinea: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Early-demographic dividend
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 7.4% against 4.4% in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.7 times Early-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Guinea ahead.
Early-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Guinea ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Guinea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Early-demographic dividend | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 5.1% | 3.1% | 2.0% | Early-demographic dividend |
| 1980s | 2.1% | 2.9% | 0.9% | Guinea |
| 1990s | 3.8% | 4.1% | 0.3% | Guinea |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 2.9% | 1.2% | Early-demographic dividend |
| 2010s | 4.2% | 6.1% | 1.9% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 5.4% | 1.8% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Early-demographic dividend or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 7.4% against 4.4% in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Early-demographic dividend and Guinea?
- 3.0%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Guinea?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Early-demographic dividend and Guinea rank globally for gdp growth?
- Early-demographic dividend ranks 17th and Guinea ranks 18th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.