Central Europe and the Baltics vs Palau: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 6.3% against 2.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Palau's figure about 2.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Palau ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th and Palau ranks 34th of 47 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 3 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.0% | Palau |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 0.3% | 3.6% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 1.3% | 1.8% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 0.2% | 1.9% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Central Europe and the Baltics or Palau?
- Palau, at 6.3% against 2.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Central Europe and the Baltics and Palau?
- 3.9%, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Palau?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Palau rank globally for gdp growth?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th and Palau ranks 34th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.