Caribbean Small States vs Libya: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Caribbean Small States
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 13.4% against 8.0% in Caribbean Small States, a difference of 5.4%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.7 times Caribbean Small States's.
The two have swapped places 32 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Libya ahead.
Caribbean Small States ranks 1st and Libya ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Caribbean Small States averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean Small States | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.4% | 25.3% | 18.8% | Libya |
| 1970s | 3.1% | 8.1% | 5.0% | Libya |
| 1980s | 1.2% | -2.6% | 3.8% | Caribbean Small States |
| 1990s | 2.8% | 1.7% | 1.1% | Caribbean Small States |
| 2000s | 3.6% | 3.8% | 0.3% | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 2.7% | 1.9% | Libya |
| 2020s | 7.1% | 2.7% | 4.5% | Caribbean Small States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Caribbean Small States or Libya?
- Libya, at 13.4% against 8.0% in Caribbean Small States as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Caribbean Small States and Libya?
- 5.4%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean Small States and Libya?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Caribbean Small States and Libya rank globally for gdp growth?
- Caribbean Small States ranks 1st and Libya ranks 3rd of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.