Cambodia vs Post-demographic dividend: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Cambodia
- Post-demographic dividend
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 5.3% against 1.7% in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Cambodia's figure about 3.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.
Cambodia ranks 45th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 45th of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Post-demographic dividend in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Post-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | -6.9% | 4.1% | 11.0% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 1980s | 4.9% | 3.0% | 1.9% | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 2.2% | 2.6% | 0.3% | Post-demographic dividend |
| 2000s | 9.0% | 1.8% | 7.2% | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 7.6% | 2.0% | 5.6% | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 3.5% | 1.6% | 1.9% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Cambodia or Post-demographic dividend?
- Cambodia, at 5.3% against 1.7% in Post-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Cambodia and Post-demographic dividend?
- 3.6%, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Post-demographic dividend?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Post-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp growth?
- Cambodia ranks 45th and Post-demographic dividend ranks 45th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.