Cape Verde vs Central Europe and the Baltics: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Cape Verde
- Central Europe and the Baltics
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 6.3% against 2.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 2.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th of 215 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Central Europe and the Baltics in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Central Europe and the Baltics | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.2% | 0.6% | 10.6% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 7.2% | 3.9% | 3.3% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 3.1% | 0.2% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2020s | 3.4% | 2.1% | 1.3% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Cape Verde or Central Europe and the Baltics?
- Cape Verde, at 6.3% against 2.4% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
- 3.9%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Central Europe and the Baltics rank globally for gdp growth?
- Cape Verde ranks 33rd and Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 35th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.