Bhutan vs Late-demographic dividend: GDP growth
GDP growth over time
- Bhutan
- Late-demographic dividend
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 8.0% against 4.5% in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 3.5%.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.8 times Late-demographic dividend's.
The two have swapped places 27 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Late-demographic dividend ahead.
Bhutan ranks 14th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 215 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and Late-demographic dividend in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Late-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 4.0% | 7.0% | 3.0% | Late-demographic dividend |
| 1980s | 9.5% | 4.8% | 4.7% | Bhutan |
| 1990s | 5.3% | 3.4% | 1.9% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 7.5% | 7.1% | 0.4% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 5.7% | 0.3% | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 4.1% | 0.8% | Late-demographic dividend |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp growth, Bhutan or Late-demographic dividend?
- Bhutan, at 8.0% against 4.5% in Late-demographic dividend as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp growth between Bhutan and Late-demographic dividend?
- 3.5%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Late-demographic dividend?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Late-demographic dividend rank globally for gdp growth?
- Bhutan ranks 14th and Late-demographic dividend ranks 15th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP growth (annual %). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.