Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0.1366 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.157 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
29th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
26th

GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.050.10.15197019962023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.157 USD per square kilometre against 0.1366 USD per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0204 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Kiribati ranks 29th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 26th of 182 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0284 USD per square kilometre 0.0453 USD per square kilometre 0.0169 USD per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1980s 0.0373 USD per square kilometre 0.0542 USD per square kilometre 0.0169 USD per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.065 USD per square kilometre 0.065 USD per square kilometre 0 USD per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.0949 USD per square kilometre 0.0865 USD per square kilometre 0.0084 USD per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0.1381 USD per square kilometre 0.1048 USD per square kilometre 0.0333 USD per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 0.1336 USD per square kilometre 0.1358 USD per square kilometre 0.0023 USD per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.157 USD per square kilometre against 0.1366 USD per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0204 USD per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 29th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 26th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-deflator-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-deflator-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 9,098 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.