Cayman Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre

Cayman Islands
0.5003 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.4046 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cayman Islands rank
11th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
12th

GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre over time

  • Cayman Islands
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.10.20.30.40.5197019962023

How they compare

Cayman Islands currently reports 0.5003 USD per square kilometre against 0.4046 USD per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0957 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cayman Islands's figure about 1.2 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Cayman Islands ranks 11th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 12th of 182 countries.

Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cayman Islands Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0699 USD per square kilometre 0.0689 USD per square kilometre 0.0011 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands
1980s 0.1645 USD per square kilometre 0.1504 USD per square kilometre 0.0141 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands
1990s 0.2685 USD per square kilometre 0.2381 USD per square kilometre 0.0304 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2000s 0.3619 USD per square kilometre 0.3022 USD per square kilometre 0.0597 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2010s 0.4199 USD per square kilometre 0.3886 USD per square kilometre 0.0314 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands
2020s 0.4763 USD per square kilometre 0.386 USD per square kilometre 0.0904 USD per square kilometre Cayman Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre, Cayman Islands or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Cayman Islands, at 0.5003 USD per square kilometre against 0.4046 USD per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre between Cayman Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0957 USD per square kilometre, with Cayman Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cayman Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gdp deflator — value us$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre?
Cayman Islands ranks 11th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 12th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cayman Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-deflator-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-deflator-value-us-2015-prices-per-square-kilometre/cayman-islands/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Cayman Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices, per square kilometre
Unit
USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
183 places, 9,098 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

GDP Deflator — Value US$, 2015 prices divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.