Bangladesh vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): GDP

Bangladesh
456.32 billion current US$
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1.29 trillion current US$
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
37th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
38th

GDP over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0500.0B1.0T1.5T196019922025

How they compare

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) currently reports 1.29 trillion current US$ against 456.32 billion current US$ in Bangladesh, a difference of 829.16 billion current US$.

That makes Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s figure about 2.8 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 66 years both countries report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 37th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 212 countries.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1960s 6.04 billion current US$ 29.43 billion current US$ 23.39 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1970s 11.27 billion current US$ 70.00 billion current US$ 58.73 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1980s 21.72 billion current US$ 132.69 billion current US$ 110.98 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1990s 39.51 billion current US$ 153.99 billion current US$ 114.49 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 70.23 billion current US$ 300.34 billion current US$ 230.11 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 212.68 billion current US$ 674.79 billion current US$ 462.12 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 432.37 billion current US$ 1.04 trillion current US$ 607.28 billion current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp, Bangladesh or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), at 1.29 trillion current US$ against 456.32 billion current US$ in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in gdp between Bangladesh and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
829.16 billion current US$, with Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for gdp?
Bangladesh ranks 37th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us/bangladesh/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us/bangladesh/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Bangladesh vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
260 places, 14,741 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.