Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
1st
Hong Kong, China rank
4th

GDP (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 360.57 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 176.3 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 45 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 336,045 current US$ per square kilometre 130.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 130.58 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 788,297 current US$ per square kilometre 176.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 176.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.31 million current US$ per square kilometre 286.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 284.72 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.77 million current US$ per square kilometre 346.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 344.26 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
360.57 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gdp (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 1st and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 13,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.