Bermuda vs Hong Kong: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre

Bermuda
159.30 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
5th
Hong Kong rank
4th

GDP (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Hong Kong
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 159.30 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 203.33 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 2.3 times Bermuda's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bermuda ahead.

Bermuda ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 4th of 210 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Hong Kong Difference Ahead
1960s 2.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.25 million current US$ per square kilometre 204,044 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1970s 6.27 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.00 million current US$ per square kilometre 4.73 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1980s 19.33 million current US$ per square kilometre 41.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 22.18 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
1990s 42.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 130.91 million current US$ per square kilometre 88.86 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2000s 94.79 million current US$ per square kilometre 176.95 million current US$ per square kilometre 82.16 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 125.10 million current US$ per square kilometre 286.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 160.93 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 141.42 million current US$ per square kilometre 346.03 million current US$ per square kilometre 204.61 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current us$), per square kilometre, Bermuda or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 362.63 million current US$ per square kilometre against 159.30 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (current us$), per square kilometre between Bermuda and Hong Kong?
203.33 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Hong Kong?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Hong Kong rank globally for gdp (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 5th and Hong Kong ranks 4th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Hong Kong: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Hong Kong: GDP (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
258 places, 13,774 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.