Latvia vs Lesotho: GDP
GDP over time
- Latvia
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 46.04 billion current LCU against 43.03 billion current LCU in Latvia, a difference of 3.01 billion current LCU.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Latvia ranks 161st and Lesotho ranks 158th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.28 billion current LCU | 3.47 billion current LCU | 194.63 million current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 13.47 billion current LCU | 10.41 billion current LCU | 3.06 billion current LCU | Latvia |
| 2010s | 23.47 billion current LCU | 26.51 billion current LCU | 3.04 billion current LCU | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 36.81 billion current LCU | 39.52 billion current LCU | 2.72 billion current LCU | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Latvia or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 46.04 billion current LCU against 43.03 billion current LCU in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Latvia and Lesotho?
- 3.01 billion current LCU, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lesotho?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Lesotho rank globally for gdp?
- Latvia ranks 161st and Lesotho ranks 158th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.