Jamaica vs Poland: GDP
GDP over time
- Jamaica
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 3.89 trillion current LCU against 3.61 trillion current LCU in Jamaica, a difference of 281.74 billion current LCU.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Poland ahead.
Jamaica ranks 78th and Poland ranks 77th of 213 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 195.12 billion current LCU | 329.85 billion current LCU | 134.73 billion current LCU | Poland |
| 2000s | 688.07 billion current LCU | 1.01 trillion current LCU | 318.05 billion current LCU | Poland |
| 2010s | 1.68 trillion current LCU | 1.81 trillion current LCU | 135.22 billion current LCU | Poland |
| 2020s | 2.96 trillion current LCU | 3.18 trillion current LCU | 216.69 billion current LCU | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Jamaica or Poland?
- Poland, at 3.89 trillion current LCU against 3.61 trillion current LCU in Jamaica as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Jamaica and Poland?
- 281.74 billion current LCU, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Poland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Poland rank globally for gdp?
- Jamaica ranks 78th and Poland ranks 77th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.