Cambodia vs Russia: GDP
GDP over time
- Cambodia
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 214.26 trillion current LCU against 205.76 trillion current LCU in Cambodia, a difference of 8.50 trillion current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 38 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 21st of 213 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 274.60 billion current LCU | 553.65 million current LCU | 274.05 billion current LCU | Cambodia |
| 1990s | 7.24 trillion current LCU | 1.40 trillion current LCU | 5.84 trillion current LCU | Cambodia |
| 2000s | 29.72 trillion current LCU | 21.92 trillion current LCU | 7.80 trillion current LCU | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 97.18 trillion current LCU | 80.06 trillion current LCU | 17.12 trillion current LCU | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 170.98 trillion current LCU | 165.04 trillion current LCU | 5.95 trillion current LCU | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Cambodia or Russia?
- Russia, at 214.26 trillion current LCU against 205.76 trillion current LCU in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Cambodia and Russia?
- 8.50 trillion current LCU, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Russia?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Russia rank globally for gdp?
- Cambodia ranks 22nd and Russia ranks 21st of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.