Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre

Malawi
164.58 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
212.62 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
38th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
36th

GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 212.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 164.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 48.04 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 38th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 210 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1980s 32,703 current LCU per square kilometre 391,348 current LCU per square kilometre 358,644 current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 416,767 current LCU per square kilometre 5.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.65 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 6.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 24.09 million current LCU per square kilometre 17.29 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 47.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 102.36 million current LCU per square kilometre 55.17 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 122.27 million current LCU per square kilometre 190.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 68.72 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre, Malawi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 212.62 million current LCU per square kilometre against 164.58 million current LCU per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre between Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
48.04 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 38th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/malawi/tanzania/">Malawi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 10,960 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.