Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
2.53 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
154th
Tuvalu rank
153rd

GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Tuvalu
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 2.53 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 45,160 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 154th and Tuvalu ranks 153rd of 210 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Tuvalu in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 143,568 current LCU per square kilometre 96,437 current LCU per square kilometre 47,132 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 488,189 current LCU per square kilometre 200,623 current LCU per square kilometre 287,565 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 769,671 current LCU per square kilometre 558,403 current LCU per square kilometre 211,268 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 1.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.05 million current LCU per square kilometre 155,649 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 1.78 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 114,975 current LCU per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 2.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.60 million current LCU per square kilometre 284,122 current LCU per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 2.53 million current LCU per square kilometre against 2.49 million current LCU per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Tuvalu?
45,160 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Tuvalu?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Tuvalu rank globally for gdp (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 154th and Tuvalu ranks 153rd of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gdp-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/tuvalu/">Central African Republic vs Tuvalu: GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
GDP (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
211 places, 10,960 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

GDP (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.