Moldova vs Namibia: GDP
GDP over time
- Moldova
- Namibia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 178.51 billion constant LCU against 160.12 billion constant LCU in Namibia, a difference of 18.39 billion constant LCU.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 129th of 214 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 111.03 billion constant LCU | 60.56 billion constant LCU | 50.47 billion constant LCU | Moldova |
| 2000s | 98.70 billion constant LCU | 89.86 billion constant LCU | 8.84 billion constant LCU | Moldova |
| 2010s | 146.68 billion constant LCU | 135.68 billion constant LCU | 11.00 billion constant LCU | Moldova |
| 2020s | 172.79 billion constant LCU | 147.61 billion constant LCU | 25.18 billion constant LCU | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Moldova or Namibia?
- Moldova, at 178.51 billion constant LCU against 160.12 billion constant LCU in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Moldova and Namibia?
- 18.39 billion constant LCU, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Namibia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Namibia rank globally for gdp?
- Moldova ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 129th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.