Malawi vs Serbia: GDP
GDP over time
- Malawi
- Serbia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 8.09 trillion constant LCU against 7.43 trillion constant LCU in Serbia, a difference of 661.37 billion constant LCU.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.
Malawi ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 51st of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.88 trillion constant LCU | 3.28 trillion constant LCU | 397.25 billion constant LCU | Serbia |
| 2000s | 3.60 trillion constant LCU | 4.47 trillion constant LCU | 872.58 billion constant LCU | Serbia |
| 2010s | 6.02 trillion constant LCU | 5.51 trillion constant LCU | 510.71 billion constant LCU | Malawi |
| 2020s | 7.73 trillion constant LCU | 6.86 trillion constant LCU | 870.66 billion constant LCU | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gdp, Malawi or Serbia?
- Malawi, at 8.09 trillion constant LCU against 7.43 trillion constant LCU in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gdp between Malawi and Serbia?
- 661.37 billion constant LCU, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Serbia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Serbia rank globally for gdp?
- Malawi ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 51st of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as GDP (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic product is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period. It can be measured in three different ways: using either the expenditure approach, the income approach, or the production approach. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment varies by country. This series is expressed in local currency units.